We will begin to see improvements in mathematics education when citizens throughout the US make their voices heard. Best wishes in your search for truth...
Saturday, March 14, 2009
Thursday, February 26, 2009
DESE and METS are supporting this?
Therefore, according to our charge, we recommend that:
No second phase of this evaluation review should be conducted to determine the effectiveness of any particular program or set of curricular programs dependent on the current database.
Saturday, February 21, 2009
Missouri Math
Friday, February 6, 2009
Please Voice Your Opinion
Look at the programs reviewed and the conclusions made by the Mathematical Sciences Education Board. Then scroll down here to see the list of "approved mathematics curricula" for eMints/METS classroom grants today.
The Algebra I "End of Course Exam" is not what high school math teachers would consider Algebra I.
We need truth in labeling!
Don't take my word for it - ASK teachers or college faculty in your area for their opinions.
If you feel that there is a problem which must be addressed, PLEASE WRITE:
Missouri House of Representatives
(Look for Members of Committees involved in Education)
Missouri Senate
(Look for Members of Committees involved in Education)
Correspondence to the State Board of Education should be addressed to the Secretary of the Board of Education with a request to forward it to individual Board members. Missouri State Board of Education
Please consider copying your correspondence to the Missouri Math Coalition and to your local School Board.
---------------------------------------------------------------
How does funding intented for educational technology affect school math programs?
Grant program-approved mathematics curriculum models Missouri METS Coalition/Alliance
"Competitive priority will be given to applicants who have implemented National Science Foundation (NSF) funded mathematics and/or science curriculum that is research-based and standards-based."
Mathematics – Eligible mathematics curricula include the following:
Elementary Mathematics
a. Everyday Mathematics®
b. Investigations in Number, Data and Space®
c. Math Trailblazers™
Middle School (Junior High School) Mathematics
a. Connected Mathematics 2™
b. Mathematics in Context®
c. MathScape: Seeing and Thinking Mathematically™
d. MATH Thematics
High School Mathematics
a. Contemporary Mathematics in Context©
b. Interactive Mathematics Program™
c. MATH Connections®: A Secondary
Core Mathematics Curriculum
d. Mathematics: Modeling Our World
e. SIMMS: Integrated Mathematics
Does this mean that if a school district wants to write a grant for badly needed technology, they have to have adopted these mediocre math materials?
I truly hope not! It's just wrong!!
Friday, January 30, 2009
Citizens Unite!!
Thursday, January 8, 2009
Undermining Local Control of Education...
SHOW ME (US) THE MONEY! (reprise)
Here is a great post that explains a recent history of the so-called "math wars", as well as how funding from the National Science Foundation has been awarded to support "math reforms"
It just doesn't make sense that millions of tax-payer dollars are spent to develop and disseminate math programs that so many mathematicians and scientists oppose
Have our tax-dollars been used to fund the demise of our nation's educational promise and economic competitiveness? (A question for NSFs Inspector General)
PLEASE SHARE THIS INFORMATION WITH YOUR FRIENDS, FAMILY, SCHOOL PERSONNEL, LOCAL AND STATE REPRESENTATIVES